Repeat Next-Generation Sequencing Testing on Progression in Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer Can Identify New Actionable Alterations.

PURPOSE: There are limited data available on the real-world patterns of molecular testing in men with advanced prostate cancer. We thus sought to evaluate next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing in the United States, focused on single versus serial NGS testing, the different disease states of testing (hormone-sensitive v castration-resistant, metastatic vs nonmetastatic), tissue versus plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays, and how often actionable data were found on each NGS test. METHODS: The Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine Multi-Institutional Collaborative Effort clinical-genomic database was used for this retrospective analysis, including 1,597 patients across 15 institutions. Actionable NGS data were defined as including somatic alterations in homologous recombination repair genes, mismatch repair deficiency, microsatellite instability (MSI-high), or a high tumor mutational burden ≥10 mut/MB. RESULTS: Serial NGS testing (two or more NGS tests with specimens collected more than 60 days apart) was performed in 9% (n = 144) of patients with a median of 182 days in between test results. For the second NGS test and beyond, 82.1% (225 of 274) of tests were from ctDNA assays and 76.1% (217 of 285) were collected in the metastatic castration-resistant setting. New actionable data were found on 11.1% (16 of 144) of second NGS tests, with 3.5% (5 of 144) of tests detecting a new BRCA2 alteration or MSI-high. A targeted therapy (poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor or immunotherapy) was given after an actionable result on the second NGS test in 31.3% (5 of 16) of patients. CONCLUSION: Repeat somatic NGS testing in men with prostate cancer is infrequently performed in practice and can identify new actionable alterations not present with initial testing, suggesting the utility of repeat molecular profiling with tissue or blood of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer to guide therapy choices.

OX40/OX40 ligand and its role in precision immune oncology.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have changed the treatment landscape for various malignancies; however, their benefit is limited to a subset of patients. The immune machinery includes both mediators of suppression/immune evasion, such as PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, and LAG-3, all of which can be inhibited by specific antibodies, and immune-stimulatory molecules, such as T-cell co-stimulatory receptors that belong to the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily (TNFRSF), including OX40 receptor (CD134; TNFRSF4), 4-1BB (CD137; TNFRSF9), and glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related (GITR) protein (CD357; TNFRSF18). In particular, OX40 and its binding ligand OX40L (CD134L; TNFSF4; CD252) are critical for immunoregulation. When OX40 on activated T cells binds OX40L on antigen-presenting cells, T-cell activation and immune stimulation are initiated via enhanced T-cell survival, proliferation and cytotoxicity, memory T-cell formation, and abrogation of regulatory T cell (Treg) immunosuppressive functions. OX40 agonists are in clinical trials both as monotherapy and in combination with other immunotherapy agents, in particular specific checkpoint inhibitors, for cancer treatment. To date, however, only a minority of patients respond. Transcriptomic profiling reveals that OX40 and OX40L expression vary between and within tumor types, and that only ~ 17% of cancer patients have high OX40 and low OX40L, one of the expression patterns that might be theoretically amenable to OX40 agonist enhancement. Taken together, the data suggest that the OX40/OX40L machinery is a critical part of the immune stimulatory system and that understanding endogenous expression patterns of these molecules and co-existing checkpoints merits further investigation in the context of a precision immunotherapy strategy for cancer therapy.

Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Doses in Allogeneic Hemopoietic Stem Cell Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality due to COVID-19. Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are blunted in these profoundly immunocompromised patients. As a result, novel strategies for protection, such as additional vaccine doses (boosters), are being explored. However, data regarding the efficacy of a third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in alloHCT recipients are limited and conflicting. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated the efficacy of a third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in alloHCT recipients. The review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, and 7 studies with 385 alloHCT recipients who received 3 vaccine doses were included. The primary outcomes assessed were the rate of seroconversion following the third dose of vaccine and the rate of seroconversion in patients who did not respond to the initial 2-dose vaccination series. RESULTS: The pooled humoral response rate after 3 doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in alloHCT recipients was 74%. In a subgroup analysis of patients who did not respond to the initial 2-dose series, the seroconversion rate following the third vaccine dose was 49%. Notably, male patients and those with a shorter interval between alloHCT and the first vaccine dose were more likely to not respond to the third dose. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the pooled humoral response rate of 74% following three doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in alloHCT recipients highlights the potential for protection in this immunosuppressed population. Additionally, encouraging responses in nearly half of the patients who did not seroconvert with the initial 2-dose series suggest the continued utilization of additional vaccine doses until results from large prospective studies become available. These findings are critical for informing vaccination strategies in alloHCT recipients to mitigate the high mortality risk associated with COVID-19.

Biomarker-Directed Therapy in Black and White Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Importance: Black men have higher incidence and mortality from prostate cancer. Whether precision oncology disparities affect Black men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is unknown. Objective: To compare precision medicine data and outcomes between Black and White men with mCRPC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data collected by the Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine Multi-Institutional Collaborative Effort (PROMISE) consortium, a multi-institutional registry with linked clinicogenomic data, from April 2020 to December 2021. Participants included Black and White patients with mCRPC with molecular data. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to May 2023. Exposures: Database-reported race and ethnicity. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the frequency of actionable molecular data, defined as the presence of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRD) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), homologous recombination repair deficiency, or tumor mutational burden of 10 mutations per megabase or greater. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of other alterations, the type and timing of genomic testing performed, and use of targeted therapy. Efficacy outcomes were prostate-specific antigen response rate, site-reported radiographic response, and overall survival. Results: A total of 962 eligible patients with mCRPC were identified, including 204 Black patients (21.2%; median [IQR] age at diagnosis, 61 [55-67] years; 131 patients [64.2%] with Gleason scores 8-10; 92 patients [45.1%] with de novo metastatic disease) and 758 White patients (78.8%; median [IQR] age, 63 [57-69] years; 445 patients [58.7%] with Gleason scores 8-10; 310 patients [40.9%] with de novo metastatic disease). Median (IQR) follow-up from mCRPC was 26.6 (14.2-44.7) months. Blood-based molecular testing was more common in Black men (111 men [48.7%]) than White men (317 men [36.4%]; P < .001). Rates of actionable alterations were similar between groups (65 Black men [32.8%]; 215 White men [29.1%]; P = .35), but MMRD or MSI-H was more common in Black men (18 men [9.1]) than White men (36 men [4.9%]; P = .04). PTEN alterations were less frequent in Black men than White men (31 men [15.7%] vs 194 men [26.3%]; P = .003), as were TMPRSS alterations (14 men [7.1%] vs 155 men [21.0%]; P < .001). No other differences were seen in the 15 most frequently altered genes, including TP53, AR, CDK12, RB1, and PIK3CA. Matched targeted therapy was given less frequently in Black men than White men (22 men [33.5%] vs 115 men [53.5%]; P = .008). There were no differences in response to targeted therapy or survival between the two cohorts. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of men with mCRPC found higher frequency of MMRD or MSI-H and lower frequency of PTEN and TMPRSS alterations in Black men compared with White men. Although Black men received targeted therapy less frequently than White men, no differences were observed in clinical outcomes.

Outcomes of Consolidative Nephrectomy following Primary Immunotherapy in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Analysis.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate effect and outcomes of combination primary immunotherapy (IO) and nephrectomy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients with advanced/metastatic RCC who received IO followed by nephrectomy. Primary outcome was Bifecta (negative surgical margins and no 30-day surgical complications). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) following surgery, reduction in tumor/thrombus size, RENAL score, and clinical/pathologic downstaging. Cox regression multivariable analysis was conducted for predictors of Bifecta and PFS. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed PFS, comparing Bifecta and non-Bifecta groups. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were analyzed (median age 63 years; median follow-up 22.5 months). A total of 40 (71.4%) patients were intermediate IMDC risk. Patients were treated with immunotherapy for median duration of 8.1 months. Immunotherapy resulted in reductions in tumor size (P < .001), thrombus size (P = .02), and RENAL score (P < .001); 38 (67.9%) patients were clinically downstaged on imaging (P < .001) and 25 (44.6%) patients were pathologically downstaged following surgery (P < .001). Bifecta was achieved in 38 (67.9%) patients. Predictors for bifecta achievement included decreasing tumor size (HR 1.08, P = .043) and pathological downstaging (HR 2.13, P = .047). Bifecta (HR 5.65, P = .009), pathologic downstaging (HR 5.15, P = .02), and increasing reduction in tumor size (HR 1.2, P = .007) were associated with improved PFS. Bifecta patients demonstrated improved 2-year PFS (84% vs. 71%, P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: Primary immunotherapy reduced tumor/thrombus size and complexity. Pathologically downstaged patients were more likely to achieve bifecta, and these patients displayed improved 2-year PFS. Our study supports further inquiry in the use of CRN following primary immunotherapy for advanced renal cancer.

Pathological Outcomes of Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Receive Nephrectomy Following Immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Even though cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) was once the standard of care for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), its role in treatment has not been well analyzed or defined in the era of immunotherapy (IO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study analyzed pathological outcomes in patients with advanced or metastatic RCC who received IO prior to CN. This was a multi-institutional, retrospective study of patients with advanced or metastatic RCC. Patients were required to receive IO monotherapy or combination therapy prior to radical or partial CN. The primary endpoint assessed surgical pathologic outcomes, including American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging and frequency of downstaging, at the time of surgery. Pathologic outcomes were correlated to clinical variables using a Wald-chi squared test from Cox regression in a multi-variable analysis. Secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR) defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and progression-free survival (PFS), which were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with reported 95% CIs. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients from 9 sites were included. Most patients were male (65%), 81% had clear cell histology, 11% had sarcomatoid differentiation. Overall, 44% of patients experienced pathologic downstaging, and 13% had a complete pathologic response. The ORR immediately prior to nephrectomy was stable disease in 29% of patients, partial response in 63%, progressive disease in 4%, and 4% unknown. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 25.3 months and median PFS was 3.5 years (95% CI, 2.1-4.9). CONCLUSIONS: IO-based interventions prior to CN in patients with advanced or metastatic RCC demonstrates efficacy, with a small fraction of patients showing a complete response. Additional prospective studies are warranted to investigate the role of CN in the modern IO-era.

Comprehensive genomic profiling: Does timing matter?

Purpose: There is variability in utilization of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) in most of the metastatic solid tumors (MST). We evaluated the CGP utilization patterns and its impact on outcomes at an academic tertiary center. Patients and Methods: Institutional database was reviewed for CGP data in adult patients with MST between 01/2012 - 04/2020. Patients were categorized based on interval between CGP and metastatic diagnosis; 3 tertiles of distribution (T1-earliest to the diagnosis, T3-furthest), and pre-mets (CGP performed prior to diagnosis of metastasis). Overall survival (OS) was estimated from the time of metastatic diagnosis with left truncation at the time of CGP. Cox regression model was used to estimate the impact of timing of CGP on survival. Results: Among 1,358 patients, 710 were female, 1,109 Caucasian, 186 Afro-Americans, and 36 Hispanic. The common histologies were lung cancer (254; 19%), colorectal cancer (203; 15%), gynecologic cancers (121; 8.9%), and pancreatic cancer (106; 7.8%). Time interval between diagnosis of metastatic disease and CGP was not statistically significantly different based on sex, race and ethnicity after adjusting for histologic diagnoses with 2 exceptions - Hispanics with lung cancer had delayed CGP compared to non-Hispanics (p =0.019) and females with pancreas cancer had delayed CGP compared to males (p =0.025). Lung cancer, gastro-esophageal cancer and gynecologic malignancies had better survival if they had CGP performed during the first tertile after metastatic diagnosis. Conclusion: CGP utilization across cancer types was equitable irrespective of sex, race and ethnicity. Early CGP after metastatic diagnosis might have effect on treatment delivery and clinical outcomes in cancer type with more actionable targets.

Stem Cell Mobilization Yields with Daratumumab- and Lenalidomide-Containing Quadruplet Induction Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Findings from the MASTER and GRIFFIN Trials.

For eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), standard of care includes induction therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Daratumumab as monotherapy and in combination treatment is approved across multiple lines of therapy for multiple myeloma (MM), and lenalidomide is an effective and commonly used agent for induction and maintenance therapy in MM. However, there is concern that lenalidomide and daratumumab given as induction therapy might impair mobilization of stem cells for ASCT. Therefore, we assessed stem cell mobilization in patients following frontline induction therapy in the MASTER and GRIFFIN phase 2 clinical studies by examining stem cell mobilization yields, apheresis attempts, and engraftment outcomes for patients from each study. Adult transplantation-eligible patients with NDMM received induction therapy consisting of daratumumab plus carfilzomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (D-KRd) for four 28-day cycles in the single-arm MASTER trial or lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (RVd) with or without daratumumab (D) for four 21-day cycles in the randomized GRIFFIN trial, followed by stem cell mobilization and ASCT in both studies. Institutional practice differed regarding plerixafor use for stem cell mobilization; the strategies were upfront (ie, planned plerixafor use) or rescue (ie, plerixafor use only after mobilization parameters indicated failure with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF] alone). Descriptive analyses were used to summarize patient characteristics, stem cell mobilization yields, and engraftment outcomes. In MASTER, 116 D-KRd recipients underwent stem cell mobilization and collection at a median of 24 days after completing induction therapy. In GRIFFIN, 175 patients (D-RVd, n = 95; RVd, n = 80) underwent mobilization at a median of 27 days after completing D-RVd induction therapy and 24 days after completing RVd induction therapy. Among those who underwent mobilization and collection, 7% (8 of 116) of D-KRd recipients, 2% (2 of 95) of D-RVd recipients, and 6% (5 of 80) of RVd recipients did not meet the center-specific minimally required CD34+ cell yield in the first mobilization attempt; however, nearly all collected sufficient stem cells for ASCT on remobilization. Among patients who underwent mobilization, plerixafor use, either upfront or as a rescue strategy, was higher in patients receiving D-KRd (97%; 112 of 116) and D-RVd (72%; 68 of 95) compared with those receiving RVd (55%; 44 of 80). The median total CD34+ cell collection was 6.0 × 106/kg (range, 2.2 to 13.9 × 106/kg) after D-KRd induction, 8.3 × 106/kg (range, 2.6 to 33.0 × 106/kg) after D-RVd induction, and 9.4 × 106/kg (range, 4.1 to 28.7 × 106/kg) after RVd induction; the median days for collection were 2, 2, and 1, respectively. Among patients who underwent mobilization, 98% (114 of 116) of D-KRd patients, 99% (94 of 95) of D-RVd patients, and 98% (78 of 80) of RVd patients underwent ASCT using median CD34+ cell doses of 3.2 × 106/kg, 4.2 × 106/kg, and 4.8 × 106/kg, respectively. The median time to neutrophil recovery was 12 days in all 3 treatment groups across the 2 trials. Because both trials used different criteria to define platelet recovery, data on platelet engraftment using the same criteria are not available. Four cycles of daratumumab- and lenalidomide-based quadruplet induction therapy had a minimal impact on stem cell mobilization and allowed predictable stem cell harvesting and engraftment in all patients who underwent ASCT. Upfront plerixafor strategy may be considered, but many patients were successfully collected with the use of G-CSF alone or rescue plerixafor.

Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Characteristics and Survival Outcomes.

Objectives Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare neoplasm accounting for <1% of all breast cancer. We evaluated the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of MBC. Methods Patients diagnosed with pathologically proven MBC were reviewed from the institutional breast cancer database from 2000 to 2017. Results A total of 136 patients diagnosed with MBC were included in the study. The median age of the diagnosis was 60 years, and 60% of patients were stage II at diagnosis, and 22% were stage III. About two-thirds of the patients were triple-negative; 93% had nuclear grade III, and 25% had a lymphovascular invasion. Squamous differentiation (29%) was the most common histologic subtype, followed by the spindle subtype (21%). The most common distant metastases were lung (22%), followed by bone (13%). Moreover, 60% had a mastectomy, 19% had endocrine therapy, 58% had radiation, 51% received anthracycline-based chemotherapy, 26% had non-anthracycline chemotherapy, and 22% received no chemotherapy. In the entire cohort, the two-year overall survival (OS) and five-year OS were 79% and 69%, respectively, and the two-year progression-free survival (PFS) and five-year PFS were 72% and 61%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, the stage of MBC (stage III: hazard ratio (HR), 5.065 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-25.27) (p=0.048)), poor functional status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, 2; HR, 24.736 (95% CI, 1.92-318.73) (p=0.014)), and distant metastasis to the brain (HR, 8.453 (95% CI, 1.88-38.04) (p=0.005)) and lung (HR, 42.102 (95% CI, 7.20-246.36) (p<0.001)) were significant predictors of decreased OS. Conclusions MBC demonstrated early disease progression and poor overall survival. The stage of MBC, decreased performance status, and metastasis to the lung and brain were independent poor prognostic factors.

Short term safety of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines in patients with solid tumors receiving systemic therapy.

BACKGROUND: There are currently three coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration to prevent coronavirus infection. However, robust data are unavailable on the adverse events of the vaccines in patients with solid tumor malignancies undergoing systemic therapies. AIM: To evaluate the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with solid tumors undergoing systemic therapies. METHODS: The study included patients with solid tumors treated in an academic tertiary care center who received COVID-19 vaccination between January 1, 2021 and August 15, 2021, while undergoing systemic therapy. Electronic medical records were accessed to collect information on patient characteristics, systemic therapies, type of vaccine received, and adverse effects associated with the vaccine administration. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. RESULTS: The analysis included 210 patients; the median age was 70 years, and 51% of patients were female. The most common chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy administered were taxane-based regimens 14.2% (30/210), anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) agents 22.8% (48/210), and antiangiogenic agents 7.1% (15/210), respectively. The most common cancers were gastrointestinal 43.8% (92/210), thoracic 30.4% (64/210), and genitourinary 17.6% (37/210). Patients received the following vaccines: 2 doses of BNT162b2 by Pfizer 52% (110/210), 2 doses of mRNA-1273 by Moderna 42% (89/210), and 1 dose of JNJ-78436735 by Johnson & Johnson 5% (11/210). At least 1 AE attributable to the vaccine was observed in 37 patients 17.6% (37/210). The total number of AEs attributable to vaccines was 62: Fifty-three grade 1 and nine grade 2. Most adverse events occurred after the second dose 59.7% (37/62). The most frequent grade 1 AEs included fatigue 17% (9/53), fever 15% (8/53), injection site reaction 13.2% (7/53), and chills 9.4% (5/53). The most frequent grade 2 AEs were fatigue 33.3% (3/9) and generalized weakness 22.2% (2/9). Therapy was delayed by 2 wk because of the AEs possibly related to vaccine administration in 3 patients 1.4% (3/210). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that the adverse events associated with COVID-19 vaccination are infrequent, mild, and rarely delay treatment in patients with solid tumors receiving systemic therapies.

A Focus on Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Sub-Classification Updates and Therapeutic Challenges.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represents a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic neoplasms deriving from the abnormal proliferation of myeloid progenitors in the bone marrow. Patients with AML may have highly variable outcomes, which are generally dictated by individual clinical and genomic characteristics. As such, the European LeukemiaNet 2017 and 2022 guidelines categorize newly diagnosed AML into favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk groups, based on their molecular and cytogenetic profiles. Nevertheless, the intermediate-risk category remains poorly defined, as many patients fall into this group as a result of their exclusion from the other two. Moreover, further genomic data with potential prognostic and therapeutic influences continue to emerge, though they are yet to be integrated into the diagnostic and prognostic models of AML. This review highlights the latest therapeutic advances and challenges that warrant refining the prognostic classification of intermediate-risk AML.

Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS): Real-world data on outcomes and prognostic factors.

Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is a recognized clinical entity. Literature regarding treatment and its outcomes in MGRS is sparse due to the rarity and misdiagnosis of MGRS. We retrospectively analyzed 280 adults with an MGRS diagnosis from 2003 to 2020 across 19 clinical centers from 12 countries. All cases required renal biopsy for the pathological diagnosis of MGRS. Amyloidosis-related to MGRS (MGRS-A) was present in 180 patients; nonamyloidosis MGRS (MGRS-NA), including a broad spectrum of renal pathologies, was diagnosed in 100 patients. The median overall survival in the studied cohort was 121.0 months (95% CI: 105.0-121.0). Patients with MGRS-A had a shorter overall survival than patients with MGRS-NA (HR = 0.41, 95%CI: 0.25-0.69; p = 0.0007). Both hematologic and renal responses were associated with longer survival. Achievement of ≥VGPR was generally predictive of a renal response (OR = 8.03 95%CI: 4.04-115.96; p < 0.0001), one-fourth of patients with ≥VGPR were renal nonresponders. In MGRS-A, factors associated with poor prognosis included elevated levels of creatinine, beta-2-microglobulin, and hemodialysis at diagnosis. In MGRS-NA, only age >65 years was associated with increased risk of death. Treatments provided similar hematologic response rates in both types of MGRS. Autologous stem cell transplantation led to better response than other treatments. This multicenter and international effort is currently the largest report on MGRS.

PROMISE: a real-world clinical-genomic database to address knowledge gaps in prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease with variable clinical outcomes. Despite numerous recent approvals of novel therapies, castration-resistant prostate cancer remains lethal. A "real-world" clinical-genomic database is urgently needed to enhance our characterization of advanced prostate cancer and further enable precision oncology. METHODS: The Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine Multi-Institutional Collaborative Effort (PROMISE) is a consortium whose aims are to establish a repository of de-identified clinical and genomic patient data that are linked to patient outcomes. The consortium structure includes a (1) bio-informatics committee to standardize genomic data and provide quality control, (2) biostatistics committee to independently perform statistical analyses, (3) executive committee to review and select proposals of relevant questions for the consortium to address, (4) diversity/inclusion committee to address important clinical questions pertaining to racial disparities, and (5) patient advocacy committee to understand patient perspectives to improve patients' quality of care. RESULTS: The PROMISE consortium was formed by 16 academic institutions in early 2020 and a secure RedCap database was created. The first patient record was entered into the database in April 2020 and over 1000 records have been entered as of early 2021. Data entry is proceeding as planned with the goal to have over 2500 patient records by the end of 2021. CONCLUSIONS: The PROMISE consortium provides a powerful clinical-genomic platform to interrogate and address data gaps that have arisen with increased genomic testing in the clinical management of prostate cancer. The dataset incorporates data from patient populations that are often underrepresented in clinical trials, generates new hypotheses to direct further research, and addresses important clinical questions that are otherwise difficult to investigate in prospective studies.

A Comprehensive Review of the Genomics of Multiple Myeloma: Evolutionary Trajectories, Gene Expression Profiling, and Emerging Therapeutics.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a blood cancer characterized by the accumulation of malignant monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. It develops through a series of premalignant plasma cell dyscrasia stages, most notable of which is the Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS). Significant advances have been achieved in uncovering the genomic aberrancies underlying the pathogenesis of MGUS-MM. In this review, we discuss in-depth the genomic evolution of MM and focus on the prognostic implications of the accompanied molecular and cytogenetic aberrations. We also dive into the latest investigatory techniques used for the diagnoses and risk stratification of MM patients.

Endocrine Toxicity and Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Malignancies Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

CONTEXT: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have gained a revolutionary role in management of many advanced malignancies. However, immune-related endocrine events (irEEs), have been associated with their use. irEEs have nonspecific clinical presentations and variable timelines, making their early diagnosis challenging. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors, timelines, and prognosis associated with irEEs development. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective observational study within the Cleveland Clinic center. PATIENTS: Metastatic cancer adult patients who received ICIs were included. METHODS: 570 charts were reviewed to obtain information on demographics, ICIs used, endocrine toxicities, cancer response to treatment with ICI, and overall survival. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of irEEs, time to irEEs development and overall survival of patients who develop irEEs. RESULTS: The final cohort included 551 patients. The median time for the diagnosis of irEEs was 9 weeks. Melanoma was associated with the highest risk for irEEs (31.3%). Ipilimumab appeared to have the highest percentage of irEEs (29.4%), including the highest risk of pituitary insufficiency (11.7%), the most severe (Grade 4 in 60%) and irreversible (100%) forms of irEEs. Forty-five percent of patients with irEEs had adequate cancer response to ICI compared to 28.3% of patients without irEEs (P = 0.002). Patients with irEEs had significantly better survival compared to patients without irEEs (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the adult population with metastatic cancer receiving treatment with ICI, irEEs development may predict tumor response to immunotherapy and a favorable prognosis. Ipilimumab use, combination ICI therapy, and melanoma are associated with a higher incidence of irEEs.

Budesonide Prophylaxis Reduces the Risk of Engraftment Syndrome After Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Engraftment syndrome (ES) after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) encompasses a continuum of periengraftment complications characterized by noninfectious fever, rash, diarrhea, and capillary leak features. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the ES outcomes in 257 consecutive patients MM patients who underwent AHCT at our institution from 12/2017 to 11/2019 with budesonide prophylaxis (3 mg PO daily at day +5 post-AHCT till the time of discharge) (N = 109) and no prophylaxis (N = 148). RESULTS: The rates of ES were significantly higher in the no prophylaxis group versus prophylaxis group [69 (46%) vs. 23 (21%); P< .001]. There was no significant difference in length of stay (LOS) [mean 15 (±3.2) vs. 16 (±2.8); P = .27] and 30-day readmission [9 (6%) vs. 8 (7%); P = .81] between the no prophylaxis and prophylaxis groups, respectively. On adjusted analysis, budesonide prophylaxis was associated with a significantly lower risk of developing ES [odds ratio (OR) 0.29 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.51); P< .0001]. There was no difference in the 30-day readmission rates [OR 1.12 (95% CI, 0.41-3.03); P = .81], but a trend for shorter LOS in the prophylaxis group [7.3% reduction in LOS (95% CI, -14.4% to 0%); P = .06]. CONCLUSION: Budesonide prophylaxis significantly reduces the risk of ES in MM patients undergoing AHCT. These promising results suggest the need for a randomized study investigate the role of budesonide for ES prophylaxis.

Increased Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism with Cancer Immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Cancer immunotherapy is associated with several immune-related adverse events, but the relationship between immunotherapy and venous thromboembolism has not been thoroughly studied. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1,686 patients who received immunotherapy for a variety of malignancies to determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism and the impact of venous thromboembolism on survival. To examine the potential role of inflammation in venous thromboembolism, we also profiled immune cells and plasma cytokines in blood samples obtained prior to initiation of immunotherapy in a sub-cohort of patients treated on clinical trials who subsequently did (N = 15), or did not (N = 10) develop venous thromboembolism. FINDINGS: Venous thromboembolism occurred while on immunotherapy in 404/1686 patients (24%) and was associated with decreased overall survival [HR=1.22 (95% CI 1.06-1.41), p<0.008]. Patients that developed venous thromboembolism had significantly higher pretreatment levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (5.382 ± 0.873 vs. 3.341 ± 0.3402, mean ± SEM; p=0.0045), interleukin 8 (221.2 ± 37.53 vs. 111.6 ± 25.36, mean ± SEM; p=0.016), and soluble vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (1210 ± 120.6 vs. 895.5 ± 53.34, mean ± SEM; p=0.0385). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that venous thromboembolism is an underappreciated and important immune-related adverse event associated with cancer immunotherapy, and may implicate an interleukin 8 and myeloid-derived suppressor cell-driven pathway in pathogenesis.